Belgium 
Canada 
China 
Germany 
Denmark 
Spain 
France 
United Kingdom 
Croatia 
Ireland 
Italy 
Japan 
Korea 
Netherlands 
Poland 
Romania 
Serbia 
Russian Federation 
Sweden 
Thailand 
United States 
Vietnam 
Itâs time to talk about the reason that gives the most incentive to fights between life-long friends, family feuds and relationship breakups. Itâs not what you think though. Itâs the different ways in which you can play AK or AQ. This article was inspired by someone who posted a few AQ hands into the Strategy Forums, and I really thought it would be a very good subject to post on here, because a lot of people are on different sides, either 3bet them always for value/blocker value, or call in position and play them defensively postflop.
6-max situations
Youâve probably decided up until now for yourself what to 3-bet and where, but hear me out on this one. One of the reasons Iâve had this much success is that Iâve learnt not to overplay my hand in different situations.
Letâs say EP is opening 8%, and youâre in MP, and you have AKo. This is a great hand to 3-bet here, because youâre fishing for information, you have awesome blockers (having an ace in your hand and a king reduces the chances of your opponent having AA by 50%, KK by 50% and AK by 44%), but you wonât be very happy if you get 4-bet by the EP original raiser.
Youâre probably going to be behind if you jam and get called. And rarely do I see players who 4-bet bluff from the EP against an MP 3-bet, so youâre either getting re-raised by QQ+/AK, or in some cases KK+/AK and getting flatted by 99-QQ, AQ usually in this case hitting the muck pretty hard. Surely, if EP is opening 8% and 4-betting only 2%, and calling some other pairs, surely heâs going to lose a lot of money preflop because heâs folding a big part of his range, isnât he ? True.
Youâre probably going to be behind if you jam and get called. And rarely do I see players who 4-bet bluff from the EP against an MP 3-bet, so youâre either getting re-raised by QQ+/AK, or in some cases KK+/AK and getting flatted by 99-QQ, AQ usually in this case hitting the muck pretty hard. Surely, if EP is opening 8% and 4-betting only 2%, and calling some other pairs, surely heâs going to lose a lot of money preflop because heâs folding a big part of his range, isnât he ? True.
Poker is all about maximizing EV and edges against your opponents and youâre going to think, alright, but if we flat AK here our value range is going to decrease, and weâll have to decrease also our bluffing range, because if we donât, weâre going to be imbalanced in this spot?
Wow, look at all the pressure youâre putting on yourself! Why not just experiment with different positions and opponents? Most of the time itâs perfect to be 3-betting it, because your opponentâs range is way behind, and youâre going to get called by a lot weaker hands that you dominate, like for example AQ/KQ which are the hands regs like to call a 3-bet most of the time with. The difficulty is playing against EP openers, in a sense of thinking about either 3-betting or just flatting.3-bet OR flat?
The truth here is that AKo flops a strong hand/draw a lot less than AKs does, so weâre going to 3-bet AKo unconditionally against people who open more than 7% at least (less than that and itâs overkill to 3-bet AK, just flat or if open is under 3%, muck it because youâre facing what I like to call a SUPERNIT), and consider if flatting or 3-betting AKs makes more sense.
The main reasoning I use here and some arguments for calling are:
Youâre suited so you have a lot more play-ability postflop- You also hate to get 4-bet off your hand
- There arenât that many trigger-happy squeezers behind you that canât wait for a re-raise (this isnât actually bad, because if they squeeze-bluff a lot and EP raiser doesnât react, as in call â the perfect spot â or fold, you can just re-pop it and no one will give you any credibility for AK)
- Thereâs a loose passive player behind that just likes to flat raises, but folds most of his range in the spot of cold-calling a 3-bet with a guy behind
The reasons to 3-bet AKs are kind of the same to 3-bet AKo, but letâs review:
- Blocker potential explained at the beginning of this article
- We get a lot of information about opponentsâ hand if he 4-bets us
- Take down a lot of uncontested pots preflop
I think that itâs hard to orient yourself only on these reasons, and that you need some solid proof to go with this, and Iâm going to show you how flatting AKs is a lot more profitable than flatting AKo preflop.
This is info taken from filtering out almost a million hands that I played:
- 3-bet AKo preflop -> 1113 hands -> 439 BB/100 hands
- Flat AKo preflop -> 928 hands -> 34 BB/100 hands - This is not a typo!
- 3-bet AKs preflop -> 301 hands -> 659 BB/100 hands
- Flat AKs preflop -> 331 hands -> 507 BB/100 hands
So you do lose a lot if you donât re-raise AKo pre-flop, but flatting AKs makes your flatting range a lot stronger (a lot of people just flat pocket pairs and some SCâs pre and are really easy to play against), and as you can see, it doesnât lose you that much money.
So, as the AKo experiment with the only flatting pre has cost me in the long run, it doesnât really mean that I lost a lot. You have to take into consideration that you can flat AK against people who open around 6% from EP and thatâs when youâre going against a very strong range, youâre not going to get a lot of money even if you hit that top pair, or you might even be dominated by an overpair.So, as tricky as it seems, I really recommend 3-betting AKo, but AKs sometimes is better just to flat it, especially if your opponent is opening AQ/AJ/KQ but heâs folding these hands if you 3-bet (for example if he opens from MP and you 3-bet from CO).
So, tread lightly with the AK because itâs a very strong friend if used in the right spots, but it can also be a very harsh enemy if you play it aggressively against the too-tight opponents!
