Cash Game Play for Tournaments
I've just been thinking about this for a while and wanted to see what other people thought.
I've hear a lot of banter about people saying a lot of tournament players don't have that great of a game compared to cash game players who maybe have spent more hours looking at certain spots in detail. I mean spots within hands themselves. The general thought may be that many tournament players have learnt how to play their stack well and know all the spots to do what with what ranges, e.g. shoving ranges, and M Zone etc.
But my main question is, if a good cash game player who has studied really well comes into a good deep stacked tournament, do you think they would have an edge over the general population of tournament players? obviously after making sure they are aware of stack play when short-stacked etc.
Just wanted to know how people thought about this.
I've hear a lot of banter about people saying a lot of tournament players don't have that great of a game compared to cash game players who maybe have spent more hours looking at certain spots in detail. I mean spots within hands themselves. The general thought may be that many tournament players have learnt how to play their stack well and know all the spots to do what with what ranges, e.g. shoving ranges, and M Zone etc.
But my main question is, if a good cash game player who has studied really well comes into a good deep stacked tournament, do you think they would have an edge over the general population of tournament players? obviously after making sure they are aware of stack play when short-stacked etc.
Just wanted to know how people thought about this.