The flop raise looks pretty big, and he seems to be repping 88 here. The 2 is a bad card in the sense that we like our hand more but a guy like this that looks loose/passive, I probably just give him credit for the set even though it's only 88 or quads. When these guys play like this it's usually the nuts so I probably fold in game.

Looks like an easy fold to me. Yes the turn card is actually great for our hand but their sizing screams value, combine that with their passive stats and massive flop raise, I'd make a fold here and feel good about it.

These kinds of spots are pretty tough without any specific reads on the villain. We can pretty much rule out all of villains dominated Qx for as he should never be choosing this kind of sizing here with a single pair hand. Villains range to me looks like it is going to be exclusively weighted towards flopped sets, flush draws, and a possible (but fairly unlikely) Q8 for top two pair. AQ is close to the top of our range here, we probably take the same line with AA/KK and then some flush draws as well.

The deuce on the turn is obviously awesome for us as it reduces the set combos that villain can have and it also gives us some equity vs 88 as well. Given how narrow his value range is here and how many possible flush draws he can be bluffing with I think I click call here and call non flush rivers as well. I'm obviously not happy about the situation at all though.

Never folding v a bet here! only 4 combos beat us here so need less than 3 combos of fd that barrel, if he has 88 it's tough really, can't fold this as we will be folding wayyyy too many hands.

I think there's a strong argument for folding the flop against a 29/9 raising a player who opened from UTG, we're also OOP, and it's a big raise too.

As played I'm folding the turn, I don't expect a passive player to be bluffing here at all. All his sizings tell you he's going for value.