J10o NL250
Whale, small blind (£550)
Player 2, big blind (£300)
Hero, button (£560)
Hero opens to £25 (J10)
Whale calls £25
Player 2 folds
***Flop*** [973]
Whale checks
Hero bets £40
Whale raises to £110
Hero raises to £525
Whale calls £525 and is all in
***Turn*** [10]
***River*** [2]
Hero shows [J10] Jack high flush
Whale mucks
Okay so some notes on Whale are that of course he is a whale, his check raising range is huge and he had just showed up with 97o after check raising a Ad 9d 5c board. He had been extremely active all night but more so as the game was wrapping up soon and he was stuck.
He is a very aggressive player and would likely 3-bet most suited broadways however I have left a few in that he may flat, but he can never have 9's or 7's, 3's is thin whether he would 3-bet or not i'm fairy sure he would but ill leave that in.
My thought process was that he isn't folding either a 9 or any flush draw T8 or 86, sets obviously and 2 pairs he calls with and against that range I have roughly 40% and I was getting around 1.4/1 on my jam, meaning I need to be getting 41.67% raw equity for my jam to be profitable. I ran some equities through an equity calculator. Against a set of 3's, all two pairs, any 9, any flush draw that he doesn't 3bet, 86o and T8o I have 39.91% when called.
His check raising range would be the same but with any 7, probably a lot of 3's but to be safe i'll just include any 7. His check raising range includes 353 combos of which 160 are 7's which he isn't willing to call it off with therefore he is folding 45% of his check raising range. I'm not sure how to work out fold equity properly but i'm assuming given how close my raw equity is to being profitable, if he is folding that often it must be profitable?
He shows up with 94o in this hand which proves a lot of logic this hand was based on. Really appreciate your thoughts.