Risk a turn? You speculated and flopped the nuts multiway, to checkraise here and hope people have JJ TT 77 KQ Q9 QQ+ and are willing to put a lot of money in with it is optimistic... Aim for 3 streets of betting. Maybe a small lead on the turn. You should be able to stack player 1 at least. The checkraise leads to a spot where player 1 is getting it in on the flop / turn to your bet, so try and draw it out in 3 streets of play.

This is an example where you just rep nuts. You rarely have KQ here or other bluffs / semi-bluffs.

Lead turn though I think is best, don't rely on the raiser to continue the turn multiway, or the extremely passive loose shortstacker to bet. They likely have something very marginal at best, and check raising against these hands will generally just get folds. Calling these hands pre, optimise when they flop big how to get the most out of their range, rather than trying to get it in with their flop stack-off ranges.

Checkraising the flop drastically narrows their ranges. I think I a saying the same thing a few different ways... Hope this idea is clear and helpful.

This is perfect. We get value from sets, pairs and draws like KQ. We want to build a pot and both players have show some aggression and willingness to put $ in the pot.

I think I would prefer leading the flop to attempt to get the money in right away vs sets before the board pairs. Hands such as top pair and AT are not folding anyway. There's also KQ which can draw over 2 streets but could take a passive line by checking multiway. Heads up I think the check raise works better than here.

think I'd just get on with it and get some ships out there on the flop. People at micros do tend to be passive multiway and this could easily get chkd round.

For me it's fire away and try to get them to come along, lots of middle to high braodways can hit here or on the turn to give villain the illusion of strength.