Danwan: Even if we have about 40% equity with KJs vs villains continuing-range its still more profitable to 3-bet them instead of flatting them he says.
Lol this is bs. There are so many variables postflop that you cannot just say that you need x percentage to make preflop 3b better than a call!
3b will be +EV sure, but when we flat we have all his KTs K9s, JQs JTs, J9s and all his small pp. So when we make to we dominate more of villains range. Moreover this hand is perfect for floating a lot of boards because it will have a drawbof some kind a lot or will block most of his TP combos (KQ/qjon qx, AK/aj on ax). This means we will have quite a high EV call on a lot of flop textures and given we are in position will be able to bet when checked to and win on a lot of board textures.
You can have a strategy where you have at as a 3b bluff sure, but I would rather use this and some other BW combos, pp and ATs-AQs to negate villains advantage on Ax, kx and qx flops and because none of these hands are loving life in a 3bp with TP. They either don't win any more money v smaller pp or are beat a lot.
Never said the 3b was bad, I just think that having it in a calling range will be a higher EV espically given the 2x raise from a passive fish.
Also in terms of getting folds... He is opening 13% of hands and is utg... I don't know if our fold equity even makes this amazing +EV as a 3b bluff.